Coleman Wong vs James Mccabe Odds Comparison - ATP Hertogenbosch

Coleman Wong vs James Mccabe Odds Comparison - ATP Hertogenbosch

Competition: ATP Hertogenbosch

Sport: Tennis

Region: ATP

Starts (UTC):

Venue: Court 6, 's-Hertogenbosch, NETHERLANDS

Match status: Not started

Odds

Typical 1X2 prices (averages across listed bookmakers): home ~1.57, away ~2.30.

Markets with odds data in this feed: 1X2, ah, ou.

The interactive odds comparison table (all bookmakers and line movement) uses JavaScript.

Info

Venue: Court 6

Round: 14

H2H

Recent form and head-to-head for Coleman Wong vs James Mccabe (static summary for search engines).

Recent matches — Coleman Wong

  • 1780565400 · Coleman Wong — 4-6,5-7 — Filippo Romano
  • 1780416600 · Coleman Wong — 7-6,7-6 — Oliver Tarvet
  • 1779636600 · Alexander Blockx — 6-3,6-4,6-2 — Coleman Wong
  • 1779366000 · Coleman Wong — 4-6,6-3,3-6 — Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
  • 1779281100 · Coleman Wong — 7-5,2-6,6-1 — Zdenek Kolar
  • 1779183000 · Coleman Wong — 6-2,4-6,7-6 — Billy Harris
  • 1778496600 · Martin Damm — 6-4,7-5 — Coleman Wong
  • 1777975200 · Akira Santillan — 6-4,6-2 — Coleman Wong
  • 1777780800 · Adam Walton — 5-7,6-7 — Coleman Wong
  • 1777691400 · Coleman Wong — 6-3,6-4 — Fajing Sun

Recent matches — James Mccabe

  • 1780488900 · James McCabe — 6-7,3-6 — Kamil Majchrzak
  • 1780306200 · Martin Damm — 6-3,3-6,4-6 — James McCabe
  • 1780219800 · William Moxon — 2-6,3-6 — James McCabe
  • 1779183000 · James McCabe — 3-6,6-7 — Zdenek Kolar
  • 1778133600 · Adam Walton — 6-3,7-6 — James McCabe
  • 1777958400 · Tung-Lin Wu — 5-7,6-7 — James McCabe
  • 1777465500 · Andre Ilagan — 4-6,6-4,6-2 — James McCabe
  • 1776996600 · James McCabe — 1-6,4-6 — Leandro Riedi
  • 1776915300 · Dane Sweeny — 7-6,1-6,6-7 — James McCabe
  • 1776736800 · James McCabe — 6-4,7-5 — Kaichi Uchida

About this match

Neither Coleman Wong nor James McCabe arrives in Hertogenbosch with a compelling run of results, yet the first available tennis odds separate them in a way that invites closer inspection. Wong opens as the clear favourite at 1.566, while McCabe is priced at 2.215, a gap that suggests market confidence in one player despite recent form that tells a more cautious story. With no head-to-head record to consult, the early prices become the main reference point, but they should be weighed carefully against the limited recent match data.

Recent form provides the only direct comparison beyond the odds. Wong has two victories from his last five matches, though both wins came against opponents without standout recent results. His losses include defeats to Filippo Romano, Alexander Blockx, and Juan Carlos Prado Angelo, a mix that points to inconsistency rather than a clear upward trend. McCabe’s single win in five outings came against William Moxon, a result surrounded by losses against Kamil Majchrzak, Martin Damm, Zdenek Kolar, and Adam Walton. Notably, both players lost to Zdenek Kolar in the same period, a shared data point that offers a small parallel but no decisive edge.

The contrast between the odds and the recent balance is the most notable feature of this early market. The favourite’s price implies a stronger performance level, but neither player has built momentum. Wong’s two wins give him a slight numerical edge, yet the quality of those wins and the losses in between limit the confidence that form alone can provide. The underdog’s price, while longer, is not prohibitive, and the lack of a clear recent pattern leaves room for uncertainty.

This match takes place during the grass‑court swing, though the tournament surface is not confirmed in the available data and the broader calendar context is limited. Both players will be competing in an ATP‑level event where adapting to conditions often becomes a factor early in the season. Without surface‑specific stats or prior meetings, the pre‑match picture rests almost entirely on how each player’s recent results line up with the first odds.

For those tracking the early market, the ATP Hertogenbosch odds provide the reference point, but the recent form offers a counterweight that deserves equal attention. The favourite’s price reflects a market assessment made before any movement or additional data has emerged. In a matchup where both players have struggled for consistency, the first odds are a starting point rather than a conclusive read. The absence of a head‑to‑head record means the early prices and recent results must be read together rather than against each other, and the limited sample of wins makes drawing firm conclusions unwise at this stage.